Insight without action is expensive curiosity. Authority Engine turns the gaps surfaced by AVI Pro, Lattice, and Counter into published reality — done-for-you content engineered specifically for AI citation, not generic SEO.
Most content tools generate articles from keyword research. We generate them from actual AI citation patterns — driven by your real visibility data. The brief comes from signal, not guesswork.
Start Publishing →Authority Engine combines insights from across the platform — AVI Pro flagging visibility gaps, Lattice flagging missing entity attributes, Counter flagging competitor-won citations — into a prioritised content brief library every month.
Each brief drives one article. Articles are drafted using bespoke prompt chains designed for AI-citation structure (not keyword stuffing). Drafts pass through human quality control to verify expertise claims, refine voice, and ensure publication-grade quality.
Published articles include schema markup, internal linking, citation-friendly structure, and entity reinforcement — every element engineered to maximise the chance of AI systems citing this content when relevant prompts arrive.
AVI scores improving. Lattice entity graphs strengthening. Counter showing competitor positions weakening. All of these are caused by content that ranks AND gets cited. Authority Engine is where it actually happens.
Most content marketing produces articles that nobody reads, AI doesn't cite, and the customer can't point to as drivers of growth. Authority Engine produces the opposite: articles directly tied to specific visibility wins, with traceable impact on your AVI Score in the following month.
And once you've seen your AVI Score climb because of an article we wrote, you can't imagine going back to keyword-driven content marketing. The retention is extraordinary.
Pull signal from AVI (visibility gaps), Lattice (missing attributes), Counter (lost citations). Prioritise into monthly brief library.
Bespoke prompt chains generate research-grade article drafts — structured for citation, not keyword stuffing.
Every draft reviewed by the team. Expertise claims verified, voice refined, facts validated. Then publication-ready.
Schema markup, internal linking, entity reinforcement applied automatically. Published direct to your site via API.
Briefs derived from your actual AVI/Lattice/Counter signals — not generic SEO keyword research.
Outline → research → draft → cite → polish. A structured prompt chain, not single-shot generation. Quality matches process.
Every article reviewed by our editorial team. Quality control catches AI errors, sharpens voice, verifies claims.
Schema markup, FAQ blocks, definition lists, citation-friendly headings — every structural element AI rewards.
Published direct to your WordPress, Webflow, or custom CMS via API. No copy-paste, no editorial team needed.
For customers running AVI Pro, we track which articles get cited by which AI platforms — and feed insight back into briefs.
Start at the tier that matches your scale. Upgrade anytime. No setup fees. Cancel anytime — though our customers rarely do.
For service businesses building authority. Four articles per month, fully structured, publishing-ready.
For growth-stage brands. Eight articles per month, plus outreach campaigns and citation monitoring.
For brands competing for category authority. Full programme — 12 articles, sustained outreach, ghostwriting, deep audits.
No — it's AI-assisted content with human quality control. The drafting uses bespoke prompt chains (not single-shot AI generation), and every article passes through editorial review before publication. The difference between "AI-generated" and "AI-assisted with human QA" is the difference between unusable filler and publication-grade work.
Google's published guidance is clear: AI-assisted content is fine if it's helpful, original, and quality-controlled. Penalties target spam, not assistance. We exceed Google's quality bar because the human QA layer eliminates the failure modes (hallucinations, generic claims, thin content) that get AI content penalised.
Yes on all tiers. Articles enter a review queue 48 hours before scheduled publication. You can approve, request revisions, or reschedule. Most customers approve all-passes after the first month — the QA layer makes review largely a formality.
We onboard with extensive industry-specific prompt engineering and source library curation. Technical industries (legal, medical, financial, engineering) typically need 4-6 weeks of refinement before output reaches publication standard. We don't hide that ramp; we plan for it.
Yes — request live URLs via the contact form. We share examples from existing customers who've consented to be referenced. (We won't fabricate examples; if our customer base is small, we say so.)
Take the free audit, explore the platform, or start a conversation. We respond within one business day.
Get in Touch